PECULIARITIES OF FAMILY INTERACTION OF PEOPLE WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF ATTACHMENT

Authors

  • Kseniia Havrylovska Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University
  • Hanna Pyroh Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University
  • Alona Palamar Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-2024-3-8

Keywords:

family interaction, attachment, secure attachment, insecure attachment, conflict behavior styles, sympathy, marriage satisfaction

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of family interaction in the context of attachment theory. An important role in family interaction is played by the ability of partners to establish close, trusting relationships, which is determined by their type of attachment. Attachment in the context of interpersonal relationships describes the emotional connection between people, reflects the level of trust, emotional openness, and desire to be together. According to J. Bowlby's theory, attachment types are formed in childhood and influence the way people build and maintain close relationships. Partners with a secure attachment type are capable of establishing deep and lasting relationships, and are open to emotional intimacy, mutual understanding, and support. Partners with insecure attachment styles may avoid intimacy and are at risk of getting into codependent, disharmonious relationships. The empirical study (n=68) allowed us to identify the peculiarities of interpersonal relationships in partners with different types of attachment. It was found that most of the subjects have a secure type of attachment, they more often choose cooperation and compromise as ways to resolve conflict situations, are open to expressions of love and sympathy in relationships, and have a high level of relationship satisfaction. Subjects with insecure attachment (anxious-ambivalent, avoidant and disorganized attachment) have some difficulty expressing love and sympathy in relationships, choose rivalry or avoidance as ways to resolve conflicts, and have a low level of relationship satisfaction. Thus, family interaction is related to the type of attachment: partners with secure attachment are more likely to show feelings and intimacy, use more constructive behavior in conflicts, and are more satisfied with their relationships than partners with insecure attachment.

References

Гавриловська К.П., Базилюк І.І. Образ сім’ї в свідомості молодих матерів із різними соціальними статусами. Молодий вчений. 2016. № 12.1 (40). С. 202–206.

Пирог Г., Горнович Ю. Особливості зв’язку прив’язаності та задоволеності партнерськими стосунками в юнацькому та зрілому віці. Психологічні дослідження. Вип. 15. 2022. С. 27–30.

Семків І.І., Вонс О.-М.С. Психологічні особливості романтичних стосунків осіб із різним типом прив’язаності в юнацькому та зрілому віці. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Серія : Психологічні науки. 2020. Вип. 3. С. 46–56.

Bartholomew K., Horowitz L. Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a fourcategory model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991. № 5 (61). Р. 226–244.

Bowlby J. A Secure Base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. Basic Books Reprint edition, 2008. 225 p.

Foroughe F., Muller T. Attachment-based interventions strategies in family therapy with survivors of intra-familial trauma: A case study. Journal of Family Violence. 2014. № 29. P. 539–548.

Hazan C., Shaver P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987. №52 (3). Р. 511–524.

Johnson S. Attachment theory in practice: Emotionally focused therapy (EFT) with individuals, couples, and families. London–New York, 2019.

Levinger G. A social psychological perspective on marital dissolution. Journal of Social Issues. 2016. № 32 (1). P. 21–47.

Li P. Attachment Styles & Your Relationships. Parenting for brain. 2014. URL: https://www.parentingforbrain.com/attachment-styles/

Simpson J.A., Collins W.A., Tran S., Haydon K.C. Attachment and the experience and expression of emotions in romantic relationships: a developmental perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007. № 92 (2). Р. 355–367.

Timmerman G. A Concept Analysis of Intimacy. Issues in mental health nursing. 2009. № 12. Р. 19–30.

Published

2024-07-29