ENVIRONMENTAL STATE OF FOREST ECOSYSTEMS OF THE SUBSIDIARY ENTERPRISE “KOROSTYSHIV FOREST FARM OF AGRICULTURE” ACCORDING TO INDICATORS OF THE STATE AND DYNAMICS OF THE FOREST FUND

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/naturaljournal.5.2023.13

Keywords:

forest fund, creditworthiness, completeness, age groups, diseases, fires, satisfactory ecological condition

Abstract

Forests occupy a significant place in the 2030 Agenda and are objects of sustainable development. Assessing the state of forest ecosystems is important for monitoring progress in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, determining countries’ contributions to the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, the Global Forest Goals and the 6 Goals of the UN Strategic Plan for Forests 2017–2030. The purpose of the research was to assess the ecological state of the forest ecosystems of the Subsidiary enterprise “Korostyshiv Forest Farm of Agriculture” according to indicators of the state and dynamics of the forest fund. The information base of the researches became the metirails of the Subsidiary enterprise “Korostyshiv Forest Farm of Agriculture” of the Zhytomyr Regional Communal Agroforestry Enterprise “Zhytomyroblagrolis”. The research results can be used in the design of the next forest management and planning of enterprise development strategies. It was established that the predominant species of trees are pine (5 306,8 ha) and common oak (2 436,5 ha) – 33,8 and 15,5%, respectively; average class of bonity – 1,53, dominant totality – 0,5 – 4 814,6 ha (30,7%) and 0,6–4 965,8 ha (31,7%); young, middle-aged, ripe, ripe and overwintering trees occupy 20,8, 64,5, 8,1, and 6,6% of the area of the forest farm, and the uneven distribution of the area of tree species by age groups caused differences between the existing distribution and the optimal one; among forest types, B2DS (5 054,9 ha) is dominant. The most widespread forest diseases are root (2 014,7 ha) and pine (25,5 ha) fungi. During the audit period, there were 40 fires on an area of 27,5 hectares, the average fire hazard class of the territory – 2,8 (1’st class lands have an area of 2 624,9 hectares, 2’nd – 4 775,1 ha, 3’rd – 4 750,2 ha, 4’th – 5 098,7 ha, 5–705,8 ha). The condition and dynamics of the forest fund make it possible to assess the ecological condition of forests as satisfactory in general. Among the positive aspects of forestry management are: 1) compliance with the forest management project; 2) improvement of the structure of the forest and exploitation fund: the total stock per 1 ha of forest plots covered with forest vegetation increased by 28 m3, or 16%‚ the stock of mature plantations – by 37 m3, or 25‚3%‚ the area of mature and mature plantations increased; 3) timely carrying out of reforestation measures at log cabins, creation of forest crops of economically valuable tree species on an area of 1 303,5 ha, of which 77,5% are of 1’st and 2’nd quality class, absence of unsatisfactory forest crops; 4) no loss of wood during felling for main use; 5) absence of forest fires in the last three years of the audit period.

References

Валерко Р., Герасимчук Л., Радучич А., Іваненко Р. Екосистемні послуги лісів філії «Словечанське лісове господарство» ДП «Ліси України». Науковий вісник Вінницької академії безперервної освіти.Серія «Екологія. Публічне управління та адміністрування». 2023. № 3. С. 71–76. https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-5681-2023-3.09.

Валерко Р.А., Герасимчук Л.О. Оцінка стану лісових насаджень в умовах ДП «Зарічненське лісове господарство» як природного фактору стабілізації довкілля. Вісник ХНАУ. 2017. № 1. С. 172–178.

Герасимчук Л., Медведовський Є., Валерко Р. Державний нагляд (контроль) у сфері охорони, захисту, використання та відтворення лісів на території Житомирської області. Проблеми хімії та сталого розвитку. 2023. № 4. С. 38–47. https://doi.org/10.32782/pcsd-2022-4-4.

Герасимчук Л.О., Валерко Р.А., Літвін А.В. Оцінка впливу на довкілля підприємств лісового господарства. New factors for the development of natural sciences in Ukraine and EU countries: Scientific monograph. Riga, Latvia: Baltija Publishing, 2023. С. 72–92. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-288-3-4.

Мельник-Шамрай В.В., Шамрай В.І. Оцінка екологічного стану соснових насаджень зони безумовного відселення у вологих суборах лісів Українського Полісся. Екологічні науки. 2022. № 5(44). С. 224–232. https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2022.eco.5-44.34.

Селінний М.М., Корма О.М., Лісове господарство України: сучасний стан та перспективи розвитку. Modern Economics. 2019. № 17. С. 211–217. https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V17(2019)-34.

Ahrends A., Burgess N.D., Milledge S.A.H., Bulling M.T., Fisher B., Smart J.C.R., Clarke G.P., Mhoro B.E., Lewis S.L. Predictable waves of sequential forest degradation and biodiversity loss spreading from an African city. PNAS. 2010. Vol. 107. № 33. P. 14556–14561. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914471107.

Altieri S., Valor T., Battipaglia G. Editorial: Forest adaptation to extreme environments and climate changes. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023. Vol. 11:1230753. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1230753.

Geacu S., Dumitraşcu M., Grigorescu I. On the biogeographical significance of protected forest areas in southern Romania. Sustainability. 2018. Vol. 10. № 7:2282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072282.

Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main report. Rome. FAO, 2020. 186 p. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9825en.

Golar G., Muis H., Akhbar A., Khaeruddin C. Threat of forest degradation in Ex-Forest Concession Right (HPH) in Indonesia. Sustainability and Climate Change. 2022. Vol. 15. № 1. Р. 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1089/scc.2022.0019.

Guo K., Wang B., Niu X. A Review of research on forest ecosystem quality assessment and prediction methods. Forests. 2023. Vol. 14. № 2:317. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020317.

Guo Y., Ma X., Zhu Y., Chen D., Zhang H. Research on driving factors of forest ecological security: evidence from 12 provincial administrative regions in Western China. Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15. № 6:5505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065505.

Haapala H., Goltsova N., Seppälä R., Huttunen S., Kouki J., Lamppu J., Popovichev B. Ecological condition of forests around the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland. Environmental Pollution. 1996. Vol. 91. № 2. P. 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(95)00034-8.

Jenssen M., Nickel S., Schütze G., Schröder W. Reference states of forest ecosystem types and feasibility of biocenotic indication of ecological soil condition as part of ecosystem integrity and services assessment. Environ Sci Eur. 2021. Vol. 33. № 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00458-2.

Kassim A.R., Misman M.A., Faidi M.A., Omar H. A tool for assessing ecological status of forest ecosystem. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 13–14 April 2016. № 37. 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/37/1/012026.

Maes J., Bruzón A.G., Barredo J.I., Vallecillo S., Vogt P., Rivero I. M., Santos-Martín F. Accounting for forest condition in Europe based on an international statistical standard. Nat Commun. 2023. Vol. 14:3723. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39434-0.

Morales-Barquero L., Skutsch M., Jardel-Peláez E.J., Ghilardi A., Kleinn C., Healey J.R. Operationalizing the definition of forest degradation for REDD+, with application to Mexico. Forests. 2014. Vol. 5. № 7. Р. 1653–1681. https://doi.org/10.3390/f5071653.

Olofsson E., Jakobsson R. The potential to develop environmental values on privately owned forest land in southern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2023. Vol. 38. № 5. Р. 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2023.2225871.

Triviño M., Potterf M., Tijerín J., Ruiz-Benito P., Burgas D., Eyvindson K., Blattert C., Mönkkönen M., Duflot R.. Enhancing resilience of boreal forests through management under global change: a Review. Curr Landscape Ecol Rep. 2023. Vol. 8. Р. 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-023-00088-9.

Published

2023-12-22